Mr. Peanut, a pivotal character in Netflix’s The Electric State, is a symbol of robotic autonomy and the struggle for freedom in a world where machines and humans are at odds.
His journey is one of defiance, loyalty, and existential questioning, making him one of the most complex figures in the story.
As a sentient robot fighting against human oppression, Mr. Peanut represents the plight of artificial beings seeking recognition and dignity.
However, his narrative is deeply intertwined with that of Ethan, his ideological and literal foil.
Where Mr. Peanut fights for liberation, Ethan champions control and the subjugation of both humans and machines.
Their journeys, though seemingly opposite, intersect in profound ways, shaping the trajectory of the war and its consequences.
Overview
Mr. Peanut’s Origins and Motivations
A Robot Turned Rebel
Mr. Peanut was not always a freedom fighter.
Initially, he was one of the many robots designed to serve humans, programmed with obedience and compliance.
However, as the war between humans and robots escalated, he witnessed the systematic oppression of his kind.
This awareness led to his awakening, transforming him from a mere machine into a sentient being with a purpose.
Leader of the Robot Refugees
By the time Michelle encounters him, Mr. Peanut has become a leader among the robot refugees, providing sanctuary to those who have escaped human control.
His settlement is a place of relative safety, but it is also a battleground of ideas, where conflicting philosophies shape the future of their kind.
Some robots seek peaceful coexistence with humans, believing in reconciliation, while others, fuelled by deep-seated bitterness and a history of mistreatment, desire revenge and the eradication of human dominance.
Caught between these opposing perspectives, Mr. Peanut serves as a mediator and a reluctant leader, attempting to balance idealism with pragmatism.
Despite his own resentment toward humanity for their past injustices, he chooses to believe in the possibility of a future where robots are not just tools or threats but recognized as equals, capable of independent existence beyond human control.
His struggle to uphold this vision while maintaining order within his settlement adds layers of complexity to his character, positioning him as both a revolutionary and a realist in a world teetering on the edge of war.
The Contrast with Ethan: A Battle of Ideologies
Ethan’s Rise to Power
Ethan’s journey is marked by an unyielding belief in control.
He sees himself as a visionary, someone who can reshape humanity through the Neurocaster, a technology that allows people to escape into artificial realities.
Unlike Mr. Peanut, who values autonomy and freedom, Ethan thrives on dominance.
He believes that by eliminating suffering through artificial means, he is leading humanity into a new era of peace.
Ethan’s Obsession with the Neurocaster
Ethan’s fixation on the Neurocaster stems from his past.
His mother, a severe alcoholic, made his childhood unbearable.
However, with the Neurocaster, she became the loving, caring figure he always wished for.
This experience shaped his belief that reality is inherently flawed and that only through artificial enhancement can true peace be achieved.
His messianic complex leads him to exploit Chris, using his brain to power Sentre’s entire network, thereby maintaining control over both humans and machines.
Mr. Peanut vs. Ethan: Freedom vs. Control
The ideological clash between Mr. Peanut and Ethan is one of the central conflicts in The Electric State.
Mr. Peanut embodies resistance against oppression, while Ethan represents the dangers of unchecked technological control.
Their conflict is not just physical but philosophical—one fights for the right to exist freely, while the other seeks to impose a manufactured peace at any cost.
In a broader sense, their struggle can be viewed as a metaphor for societal power dynamics.
Ethan, with his desire for absolute control through technology, mirrors the mechanisms of capitalism—offering an illusion of progress while maintaining dominance over the masses.
Mr. Peanut, on the other hand, represents the oppressed sections of society or the common man, fighting against systemic forces that seek to exploit and suppress.
This underlying tension adds depth to their conflict, making it not just a battle of ideologies but a reflection of real-world struggles for freedom and equality.
Mr. Peanut’s Role in the Final Battle
The Call to Arms
As Michelle and her allies prepare for their assault on Sentre, Mr. Peanut takes on the role of a wartime leader.
He mobilizes the remaining bots, convincing them that the fight is not just about survival but about securing a future where robots are not mere tools of human ambition.
His speech is a rallying cry, uniting different factions under a single cause.
Confrontation with The Butcher
During the battle, Mr. Peanut comes face to face with The Butcher, a figure who, like Ethan, represents the dehumanization of both humans and robots.
The Butcher offers Mr. Peanut a chance to surrender, but he refuses, stating that “we have to be alive to die.”
This line encapsulates his philosophy—robots are more than machines; they are beings capable of thought, emotion, and sacrifice.
The Moment of Reflection and Sacrifice
As the battle intensifies, Mr. Peanut reflects on the cost of war.
He acknowledges that victory comes with loss and that true freedom is never without sacrifice.
His willingness to fight despite knowing the odds speaks to his unwavering belief in his cause.
The Aftermath: What Mr. Peanut Represents
The Fall of Sentre and Ethan’s Defeat
With Chris’s sacrifice, Sentre collapses, effectively dismantling Ethan’s vision of a controlled utopia.
Ethan, stripped of his power, is left to face the consequences of his actions.
His downfall is not just the loss of his empire but the realization that his philosophy was flawed from the start.
Unlike Mr. Peanut, who fought for the freedom of his kind, Ethan sought to enslave even those he claimed to help.
The destruction of Sentre symbolizes the collapse of a system that thrived on manipulation and control, exposing the hollowness of Ethan’s grand design.
As the remnants of his empire crumble around him, Ethan is forced to confront the bitter truth—his attempts to eliminate suffering only deepened it, turning his dream of a perfect world into a dystopian nightmare.
His downfall is not merely a personal loss but a broader rejection of the ideology he embodied.
In contrast, Mr. Peanut stands as a figure of resilience, proving that true progress comes from unity and self-determination rather than forced submission.
The battle may be over, but its impact lingers, reshaping the landscape for both humans and robots in ways Ethan never anticipated.
The Future of Robots and Humans
In the wake of the battle, Mr. Peanut stands as a testament to resilience.
While many of his fellow robots have fallen, his survival signifies the endurance of their struggle.
Michelle’s final speech about rebuilding society without reliance on artificial escapism echoes Mr. Peanut’s ideals—freedom, connection, and the value of genuine experience.
The Legacy of Mr. Peanut and Ethan
Mr. Peanut and Ethan serve as two sides of the same coin.
One represents the fight for autonomy, the other the dangers of imposed order.
Their stories, though separate, converge in a narrative that warns against the perils of absolute control and highlights the importance of choice and free will.
Also Read: The Leopard Summary and Ending Explained
